Skip to Content

Does blowing the whistle violate company loyalty?


Whistleblowing can be a controversial issue that pits employee loyalty against doing what’s morally right. There are good arguments on both sides of whether employees should report unethical or illegal activities by their employer. Here we’ll look at some key questions around whistleblowing and company loyalty.

What is whistleblowing?

Whistleblowing is when an employee reports wrongdoing within an organization to parties that can take action. Typically, this means reporting to regulatory bodies, law enforcement, the media, or watchdog groups. The wrongdoing may include fraud, corruption, illegality, or activities that harm the public interest. The whistleblower provides evidence to back up their claims.

What protections exist for whistleblowers?

Laws in many countries protect whistleblowers from retaliation by their employers. In the US, some of the key laws are:

– The Sarbanes-Oxley Act – Provides protection for whistleblowers who report financial fraud and other violations.

– The Dodd-Frank Act – Protects whistleblowers who report violations of financial regulations.

– The False Claims Act – Allows whistleblowers who report fraud against the government to receive a portion of any penalties.

– OSHA laws – Prevent employers from retaliating against employees who report safety concerns.

So there are legal protections for whistleblowers who take the proper steps to report misconduct through approved channels. However, many employees are still reluctant to blow the whistle.

What arguments support blowing the whistle?

Here are some of the main arguments in favor of whistleblowing:

– It can stop unethical, dangerous or illegal activities that harm the public. Whistleblowers can prevent damage before it escalates.

– It holds corporations and institutions accountable for misconduct. Whistleblowers provide a check against abuses of power.

– Reporting wrongdoing demonstrates loyalty to moral principles over blind loyalty to an employer. Obeying one’s conscience is a higher duty.

– In many cases, reporting is required by professional codes of ethics and by law. There can be serious consequences for staying silent.

So in essence, whistleblowing uphold’s one’s duty to society, morality, professional ethics and the law over loyalty to any single company. It takes courage to go against superiors, but can be necessary to prevent harm.

What arguments support not blowing the whistle?

Here are some of the main arguments against whistleblowing:

– It violates employee loyalty and trust. Companies expect discretion about internal matters.

– It can unfairly sabotage a company’s reputation over an isolated problem. Whistleblowing causes disproportionate damage.

– Proper channels within the company, not the media, should be used to address concerns. Going public is overkill.

– Accusations can be false or exaggerated. Whistleblowing can destroy careers based on rumors not facts.

– It discourages openness and integrity if employees fear they are under constant threat of being reported.

So opponents emphasize loyalty to the company that gave you a job. They say whistleblowing erodes workplace trust and harms reputations without due process.

Key factors to consider

There are a few important factors to weigh when deciding whether to blow the whistle:

Seriousness of the misconduct

– Minor issues of questionable ethics are different than systematic fraud, threats to public health, or clear violations of the law. The scale of damage matters.

Likelihood of retaliation

– In reality, many whistleblowers suffer consequences like being demoted, having pay cut, or getting fired. This needs to be accounted for.

Possibility of remaining anonymous

– Anonymity helps reduce retaliation. But many whistleblowers end up being identified during investigations.

Channels for reporting

– Proper procedures like reporting to regulatory agencies can provide some protection vs. leaking to the media. But not in all cases.

So the specifics of the misconduct and options for reporting play a big role in the whistleblowing decision. There are grey areas where reasonable people can disagree if it warrants going outside the company.

Examples where whistleblowing was justified

Here are some real-world examples where whistleblowing exposed unethical or dangerous behavior:

Tobacco industry scandals

In the 1990s, whistleblowers leaked internal documents showing tobacco companies knew the addictive hazards of nicotine but covered it up. This contributed to lawsuits that held the industry accountable.

Volkswagen emissions fraud

In 2015, engineer James Liang exposed how Volkswagen used illegal software to cheat on emissions tests. This massive fraud ended up costing the company over $30 billion in fines and penalties.

Enron accounting fraud

Vice President Sherron Watkins reported massive accounting irregularities that turned out to be fraud at energy company Enron. Her actions contributed to the company’s collapse.

Catholic Church sex abuse

In 2002, insiders leaked church documents showing leaders covered up extensive child sex abuse by priests for decades. This prompted investigations worldwide.

So when public health, massive fraud, and abuse are at stake, most agree that loyalty to a corporation should come second to societal impact. But grey areas remain where reasonable people can differ.

Conclusion

In summary, whistleblowing involves weighing one’s moral duties and professional ethics against loyalty to an employer. There are good faith arguments on both sides. When misconduct is systemic and threatens public welfare or the law, whistleblowing is often viewed as the right choice despite potential consequences. But for minor issues or accusations without evidence, following internal processes may be a better path. Each situation requires weighing multiple factors around the misconduct itself and options for reporting it. In clear cases of criminal behavior or social harm, whistleblowing often succeeds in holding institutions accountable in ways that improve society.