Skip to Content

What religions do not believe in the virgin birth?

The virgin birth of Jesus is a foundational doctrine of Christianity. It refers to the belief that Mary conceived Jesus through the power of the Holy Spirit, without a human father. This miraculous conception made Jesus both fully human and fully divine. While the virgin birth is central to Christian theology, it is not universally accepted by all religions. Several major world religions reject the doctrine of the virgin birth of Jesus Christ.


Judaism completely rejects the virgin birth of Jesus. According to Jewish beliefs, Jesus did not fulfill the Messianic prophecies and is not considered the Messiah. The Messiah, in Jewish theology, is a human leader who will usher in a new era of peace and restore the Jewish nation. Jews believe the Messiah has not yet come and do not accept the divinity of Jesus or the concept of his virgin birth.

The Torah, which encompasses the central teachings of Judaism, contains many prophecies about the coming of a Messiah. However, none of these prophecies mention a virgin birth. The Messiah is understood to be a mortal man, descended from King David. The idea that the Messiah would be born of a virgin is foreign to Jewish scriptures and teachings. Additionally, the Jewish faith strictly maintains that God is one, not three persons, and cannot take human form. The theology of the virgin birth and the incarnation of God into human form through Jesus Christ is completely incompatible with Judaism.

Key Points

  • Judaism believes the true Messiah has not yet come.
  • Jewish theology rejects Jesus as the Messiah.
  • The Torah contains no prophecies about a virgin birth.
  • Jewish beliefs cannot accommodate the concept of God incarnate through a virgin birth.


Islam categorically denies the virgin birth of Jesus. According to the Quran, Jesus was a noble prophet, but he is not considered divine in any capacity. The Islamic faith views the concept of the Trinity, and Jesus as the son of God, as blasphemous. It associates this doctrine with polytheism.

Muslims believe Jesus was conceived naturally by the will of God, not through a miraculous virgin birth. The Quran acknowledges Mary as a pure and holy saint and affirms the virginity of her conception. However, it argues that the act of blowing into Mary’s being referenced in the Quran does not imply a literal virgin birth in the Christian sense. Islamic scholars maintain this was a spiritual event, not a miraculous breaking of natural law.

Additionally, Islam believes Jesus was not crucified and resurrected. It rejects the premise that God would allow one of his holy prophets to face such a degrading death. Therefore, the theological significance of the virgin birth within Christian teachings, connecting it to the redemption of humanity through Jesus’ sacrifice, does not extend to Islamic beliefs.

Key Points

  • Islam regards Jesus as a prophet, not the son of God.
  • The Quran affirms Mary’s virginity but rejects the miraculous virgin birth.
  • Muslims believe Jesus had a natural conception, not a supernatural one.
  • Islam also rejects the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus.


Hinduism makes no direct commentary on the virgin birth of Jesus Christ. However, Hindu teachings contain some perspectives that conflict with this doctrine. First, Hinduism affirms the existence of many gods (polytheism), rather than the singular Christian God. It contains rich narratives about the births of Hindu deities, while Christian teachings adamantly affirm the uniqueness of Jesus Christ.

In Hindu stories, gods take human form at various times. Some Hindu incarnations were born from virgins, such as the deity Krishna. The concept of miraculous virgin births is not foreign to Hinduism. However, these events are not specifically linked to Jesus Christ. There are no Hindu prophecies or scriptures that validate the virgin birth as it relates to Jesus.

Additionally, Hinduism embraces the idea that spiritual teachers come in many forms. While Jesus may be considered an enlightened being, his divinity and the exceptionalism of his virgin birth are not critical beliefs in Hinduism. The multitude of Hindu gods allows for teachings that conflict with the absolute declarations of Christ’s exclusive divine nature.

Key Points

  • Hinduism accepts many gods, not one exclusive God.
  • Virgin births occur in Hindu teachings, but not related to Jesus.
  • Jesus holds no special theological significance in Hinduism.
  • Hindu teachings allow for conflicting ideas on Jesus’ nature.


Buddhism represents a non-theistic belief system that does not center around virgin birth concepts. Buddhists do not deny the virgin birth of Jesus outright. However, the historicity of this event carries no real doctrinal weight. Buddhist teachings focus on spiritual enlightenment through the end of human suffering, rather than theology about a personal deity.

In Buddhist thought, Jesus would be considered a compassionate teacher or bodhisattva, one who reaches enlightenment but delays entering nirvana to help others. However, he holds no status above any other enlightened figure. The specifics of his miraculous conception and birth would be viewed as symbolic rather than literal articles of faith. Buddhists do not affirm or deny the virgin birth either way because it has no bearing on their key beliefs.

Additionally, Buddhists vary on whether they consider Buddhism to be a religion at all. Within an academic context, it lacks many standard features of an organized religion. Many followers regard Buddhism as a philosophy, ethical system, or way of life rather than an faith built around specific theological doctrines. This provides even less reason for adherents to take a definitive stance on Jesus’ virgin birth.

Key Points

  • Buddhism does not center around doctrines like the virgin birth.
  • The birth of Jesus holds minor relevance in Buddhist thought.
  • Buddhism approaches spirituality in a non-theistic way.
  • There is no reason for most Buddhists to accept or deny the virgin birth.


Sikhism, founded in the 15th century CE, lacks a clear position on the virgin birth of Jesus Christ. The religion combines elements of Hinduism and Islam, while rejecting certain teachings of each. Sikhs believe in one formless God who is described using typical Hindu and Islamic attributes. However, they do not accept that God takes human form.

Historical Sikh writings do not specifically mention the virgin birth of Jesus. While Sikhism recognizes and respects the value of teachings from multiple religions, the theology of Jesus as the exclusive son of God conflicts with core Sikh beliefs. Sikhism precludes the idea that God is personalized, and therefore necessitated an earthly form like Jesus Christ.

At most, Jesus would potentially be considered an enlightened teacher who possessed some divine attributes like other prophets and holy figures. The exceptionalism of his miraculous virgin birth and incarnation of God, which sets Christianity apart, lacks relevance in the Sikh tradition. Since it is not mentioned in the Sikh holy texts and contradicts Sikh concepts of God, most Sikhs would reject the virgin birth narrative.

Key Points

  • The virgin birth is not mentioned in Sikh scriptures.
  • Sikhism rejects God in human form, conflicting with Jesus as God’s son.
  • Jesus would possibly be seen as a holy prophet, but not the exclusive son of God.
  • The exceptionalism of Jesus’ virgin birth is incompatible with Sikh views.

Atheism and Agnosticism

Atheism broadly rejects the existence of a deity or divine power, while agnosticism expresses uncertainty about the existence of a god. Both belief systems inherently exclude the plausibility of a miraculous virgin birth.

Atheism denies the involvement of any supernatural agent in natural events or human affairs. The act of God to impregnate a human female would be discounted categorically by atheistic philosophy. Agnostic positions would also preclude the certainty of a miracle like the virgin birth, considering the lack of empirical evidence.

Additionally, atheism and agnosticism approach historical and scriptural accounts in pragmatic terms. The virgin birth as documented in the Gospel accounts would be viewed as symbolic or metaphorical narratives rather than factual reports. The lack of multiple contemporary sources outside the Bible would also cast doubt. Scientific skepticism precludes affirming a miraculous event without considerable physical proof.

Overall, the virgin birth represents an impossibility within an atheistic or agnostic worldview. It requires faith in a supernatural deity whose empirical existence cannot be fully verified. Therefore, atheists and agnostics universally reject this doctrine, viewing it as religious imagination rather than demonstrable reality.

Key Points

  • Atheism denies any divine intervention in human affairs.
  • Agnosticism expresses uncertainty about theological claims.
  • The virgin birth lacks sufficient empirical evidence for non-believers.
  • It is viewed as religious fiction rather than historical fact.


While the virgin birth of Christ represents a core doctrine in Christianity, it is not universally accepted. It is outright rejected in some faiths due to contradictions with scripture or theology. Other religions are less concerned with the factual historicity of this event. But the uniqueness and significance imputed to Jesus’ miraculous conception in Christianity are foreign to their teachings.

For atheists and agnostics, questions regarding the truth of the virgin birth fall outside the realm of consideration altogether. Without a precise denial, they consider its factuality dubitable based on scientific skepticism and an absence of concrete evidence. Moving forward, it is important for religious leaders to recognize these differences in perspective to have open and honest dialogue between faith traditions.