Skip to Content

Who was on earth first?

The question of who was on earth first is a tricky one to answer. When we think of the beginning of human existence, we often picture our earliest ancestors roaming the earth alongside prehistoric creatures like dinosaurs. However, the truth is that humans did not appear until much later in the planet’s history. In this blog post, we will explore the origins of life on earth and how it has evolved to become what we know today.

The Earliest Life on Earth

The earliest life forms we know of were microscopic organisms called microbes. These tiny creatures left signals of their presence in rocks about 3.7 billion years old. They were single-celled and lacked a nucleus, meaning they were prokaryotes. These early life forms changed the earth’s atmosphere by producing oxygen as a byproduct of photosynthesis. This allowed for the evolution of more complex organisms over time.

The First Multi-Cellular Organisms

Around 1 billion years ago, the first multi-cellular organisms emerged. These were simple creatures like sponges and jellyfish that lacked organs and nervous systems. From there, life continued to evolve and diversify. The first animals with backbones, fish, appeared about 500 million years ago. They were followed by plants, insects, amphibians, reptiles, and eventually mammals.

The Rise of Humans

Despite the fact that humans did not appear until much later in the earth’s history, our species has had a significant impact on the planet. Homo sapiens, the scientific name for humans, first emerged in Africa about 300,000 years ago. Over time, we developed language, culture, and technology that allowed us to thrive and dominate the planet. Today, there are over 7 billion humans on the planet.


In conclusion, the question of who was on earth first is a complex one. While humans did not appear until relatively recently in the planet’s history, life has been evolving on this planet for billions of years. From the earliest microbes to the complex creatures we have today, life has continued to adapt and evolve in response to changing environmental conditions. As we continue to learn more about our planet’s history, we can appreciate the incredible diversity and resilience of life on earth.


Where is Lucy the first human?

Lucy is the nickname given to a 3.2 million year old fossilized skeleton discovered in Ethiopia in 1974. This specimen is one of the most significant archaeological finds of the past century, as it represents one of the earliest known hominids, or members of the human family tree. In terms of where Lucy is located today, her remains can be found in the Paleoanthropology Laboratories of the National Museum of Ethiopia in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Due to the rare and fragile nature of many fossils, including hominid specimens such as Lucy, great care must be taken to protect them from damage or destruction. As a result, special precautions have been taken to preserve the original fossilized remains. To do this, scientists have made molds of the original bones, enabling them to study and analyze the remains without risking damage to the original bones themselves.

The real Lucy, however, is still housed in a specially constructed safe within the museum. This safe is designed to protect the valuable hominid specimen from damage, theft, or any other kind of harm that may arise. While visitors to the museum are not able to view the actual fossil, they can view molds, replicas, and other visual aids that help to illustrate the physical characteristics and historical significance of this ancient ancestor of modern humans.

Lucy remains an important figure in the field of anthropology and an important part of Ethiopia’s cultural heritage. While her physical remains are securely stored away, her legacy and impact on our understanding of human evolution continues to be studied and admired by scientists and historians around the world.

How did life start on Earth?

The origins of life on Earth are still shrouded in mystery, but scientists have made great strides in understanding how it could have started. The earliest life forms we know of were microscopic organisms (microbes) that left signals of their presence in rocks about 3.7 billion years old. The signals consisted of a type of carbon molecule that is produced by living things.

One scientific theory suggests that life began in a warm, nutrient-rich soup that existed on Earth almost 4 billion years ago. This soup may have contained simple organic molecules such as amino acids and sugars, which are the building blocks of life. A series of chemical reactions may have caused these simple organic molecules to combine and form more complex molecules, such as lipids and nucleic acids. Over time, these molecules could have combined to form the first cells, which were very simple single-celled organisms.

Another theory suggests that life may have begun in underwater hydrothermal vents. These vents spew superheated water that contains minerals and other chemicals. Scientists have discovered microbes that can survive in these extreme environments, and some of these microbes use chemicals released by the vents as a source of energy. It’s possible that the first life forms on Earth developed in environments like these, using chemicals released by the vents as a source of energy.

There is also the idea that life may have been brought to Earth from outer space. Scientists have discovered evidence of amino acids and other organic molecules in meteorites that originated from other parts of the solar system. It’s possible that these molecules could have arrived on Earth via meteorites and then combined to form the first life forms.

While we don’t know exactly how life started on Earth, scientists are continuing to make progress in understanding the origins of life. As our understanding of the chemistry of life and the conditions necessary for its development increases, we may eventually be able to unlock the secrets of how life came to be on Earth.

What did humans look like 10,000 years ago?

Humans are a fascinating species, and many people are interested in learning about our past and how we evolved over time. One commonly asked question is what humans looked like 10,000 years ago. While there is no definitive answer to this question, scientists and researchers have been able to gather information about our ancient ancestors through various means, such as archaeology, genetics, and anthropology.

Firstly, it’s worth noting that 10,000 years is a relatively recent period in human history. This era is usually referred to as the Holocene epoch, and it marks the start of the agricultural revolution when humans began to domesticate animals and cultivate crops. However, in terms of physical appearance, humans who lived 10,000 years ago looked essentially the same as they do today.

One way we can determine what humans looked like in the past is by studying their skeletons and comparing them to modern ones. While there may be some variations in height and build due to differences in diet and lifestyle, there is no evidence to suggest that our ancestors looked dramatically different from us. For instance, the average height of humans is thought to have been slightly shorter in the past, likely due to lower nutritional levels and a lack of modern medicine. However, these differences are negligible, and our ancestors would still be recognizable as human beings by today’s standards.

Another way researchers are able to infer what ancient humans looked like is through genetic analysis. By studying the DNA of skeletal remains, they can determine various physical traits such as hair and eye color, skin tone, and even facial features. While this method provides valuable insights, it is limited by the fact that DNA deteriorates over time, and many ancient remains have degraded to the point where it is difficult to obtain meaningful data.

While there may be some minor differences in physical appearance between humans who lived 10,000 years ago and modern humans, these differences are not significant enough to render them unrecognizable as our ancestors. It’s clear that over the course of our evolution, humans have undergone various changes in their physical appearance, from adaptations to different climates to the development of complex civilizations. However, looking specifically at the period 10,000 years ago, there is no evidence to suggest that our ancestors looked dramatically different from us.

How old is the human race?

The question of how old the human race is can be answered in different ways, depending on what aspect of human evolution and development one focuses on. In terms of the overall lifespan of the genus Homo, our ancestors have been around for about six million years. During this time, various species of early humans emerged and disappeared, including Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, and others.

However, if we narrow our scope to the evolution of modern humans, or Homo sapiens, the timeline becomes more focused. Modern humans first appeared in Africa around 200,000 years ago, during a period known as the middle Stone Age. By about 50,000 years ago, our ancestors had spread to other parts of the world, including Europe, Asia, and Australia. The migration of modern humans from Africa to other continents is a complex and ongoing subject of study, but it is generally accepted that early humans adapted to different environments and developed distinct physical and cultural traits over time.

In terms of civilization and recorded history, the human race is much younger. The first civilizations – societies with complex agriculture, social hierarchies, and written language – emerged around 6,000 years ago in Mesopotamia, Egypt, and other parts of the world. These early civilizations laid the foundation for much of the technology, culture, and governance that we still see today. Over time, various empires rose and fell, religions and philosophies formed, and human societies expanded in both scope and complexity.

Finally, if we look at the recent history of human civilization, we can see how rapidly our species has changed in just the past few hundred years. The industrial revolution, which began in Britain in the late 18th century and quickly spread to other parts of the world, transformed the way humans lived and worked. With the invention of machines and the harnessing of energy from coal, oil, and other sources, humans were able to produce goods on an unprecedented scale and at an unprecedented speed. The past century has seen even more rapid technological progress, with the advent of computers, the internet, and other digital technologies that have fundamentally transformed the way we communicate, learn, and do business.

The question of how old the human race is depends on what we mean by “human”. If we take a broad view, the human race is millions of years old, and has seen many different species of early humans come and go. However, if we focus on modern humans – who look and behave much like we do today – the species is only around 200,000 years old. The development of civilization, complex societies, and recorded history is much more recent, starting around 6,000 years ago. Finally, the rapid pace of technological progress in recent centuries has transformed human society in ways that are still unfolding.

How did prehistoric humans mate?

It’s difficult to say with complete certainty how prehistoric humans mated, as there are no written or recorded accounts from that era. However, anthropologists and archaeologists have been able to make reasonable assumptions based on fossil evidence and observations of modern-day primates.

It’s generally believed that prehistoric humans, specifically early Homo sapiens, had social structures that were similar to those of chimpanzees. One key similarity is that there was likely a dominant male who had access to multiple females. This is often referred to as a polygamous mating system.

In this system, the dominant male would engage in mating frequently and with multiple partners, while less dominant males would either not get the chance to mate at all or mate less frequently. This type of mating system is still observed in some primate species today, such as gorillas.

One key difference between early humans and chimpanzees, however, is that early humans likely became monogamous over time. This can be seen in the evolution of the human body, specifically the reduction in the size difference between males and females. In chimps, males are much larger than females, which is thought to be an adaptation to competing for access to females. But as humans evolved, the size difference between males and females decreased, suggesting that there was less competition for mating partners.

It’s also important to note that while polygamous mating may have been dominant among early humans, it’s likely that there were also variations and outliers within these systems. Not every mating relationship would have fit into this mold.

In terms of the actual act of mating, there is little evidence to suggest whether early humans engaged in sexual behavior that was different from what is observed in other primates. Given what we know about the similarities in social structures, it’s likely that early humans engaged in intercourse in a similar fashion to chimps or gorillas.

Of course, it’s important to remember that these are all just theories and assumptions based on what we’ve observed of primates and what we know of early human history. As with any field of study, there is still much that we don’t know and may never know about how prehistoric humans mated.