Skip to Content

Should parents take away cell phones as a punishment?

In today’s world, cell phones have become an integral part of most teenagers’ lives. According to a recent Pew Research Center survey, 95% of teens report they have a smartphone or access to one. For most teens, their phone is their main tool for communicating with friends, accessing the internet, playing games, listening to music, and more. This high level of cell phone use and dependence among adolescents has led many parents to use taking away a teen’s phone as a disciplinary measure or punishment when rules are broken. But is removing a child’s cell phone an effective or appropriate punishment? There are reasonable arguments on both sides of this debate.

Reasons for taking away a child’s phone as punishment

Here are some of the main arguments in favor of taking away a teen’s phone as punishment:

  • It’s an immediate way to restrict privileges and freedom.
  • It removes access to activities a teen enjoys.
  • It eliminates social connections and peer interactions.
  • It motivates teens to improve their behavior in order to get their phone back.
  • It temporarily blocks inappropriate activities done on their phone.
  • It teaches the consequences of breaking rules.

For parents who feel their teen is overly attached to their device, removing phone privileges can feel like an obvious and effective punitive measure. Teens cherish their phones and being without one is a state many can’t tolerate for long. Severing a teen’s digital connection to friends can motivate them to correct behavior and follow rules in order to regain access. When concerning behaviors like cyberbullying or viewing inappropriate content are happening on a teen’s device, a parent may use confiscation as a way to immediately halt the behavior and remove temptation. Overall, supporters of this disciplinary tactic argue it is reasonable for parents to take away something valued if rules are broken, and in today’s world, few things are more highly valued by teens than their phones.

Reasons against taking away a child’s phone

On the other hand, there are also arguments against using phone removal as a disciplinary measure. Here are some of the main points made by opponents:

  • It removes access to vital communications.
  • It does not teach long-term better behavior.
  • It hinders building trust and mutual understanding between parent and teen.
  • It can lead to resentment and damaged relationships.
  • It removes a main learning and creativity tool.
  • It punishes social connections with friends and relatives.

Today’s smartphones are not just entertainment devices—they are lifelines providing constant access to information, support systems, and safety nets. Taking one away removes a teen’s ability to communicate with parents if needed, coordinate schedules and transportation, do research for school, keep up with current events, have discussions with friends, learn through apps and videos, and fill endless gaps of waiting time constructively. While the intended lesson is to motivate rule following, opponents point out that it does not teach teens to make better choices and regulate their own behavior when they have access to their phone. It also fails to get at the root reasons for misbehavior and build more family connection and trust. Punishing through phone removal is seen as passive aggressive and unlikely to improve the parent-teen relationship long-term. Teens resent the disproportionate penalty of losing major educational and social tools for minor or accidental infractions. Overall, those against this punishment argue it exacts an excessive price from teens compared to the offense, breeds resentment, and fails to promote genuine responsibility.

Factors to consider in determining the appropriateness

In deciding if and when to implement taking away a teen’s phone, parents should consider the following factors:

  • The severity of the offense – Minor incidents may warrant lighter punishments vs. serious violations of trust or safety.
  • The purpose of the punishment – Is it to halt an immediate danger? Develop improved behaviors over time? Or exert control?
  • The teen’s level of phone dependence – A mild dependency may lead to minor annoyance vs. high anxiety.
  • Access to other communications – Does the teen have computer/internet access to maintain some connections?
  • How a teen will occupy time without their phone – Will boredom or isolation lead to other misbehaviors?
  • The parent-teen relationship – Will this exacerbate or alleviate tensions? Undermine or build trust?

Parents know best what means most to their individual child. Removing phone privileges will severely affect some teens more than others. The level of impact should determine if this punishment fits the situation. Of course no single method works in all cases. Experts encourage using a variety of disciplinary tools tailored the child and looking for opportunities to have meaningful discussions about rules and boundaries.

Guidelines for implementing phone removal as a punishment

If a parent decides that taking away a teen’s phone is warranted in some circumstances, experts advise setting rules and limitations around implementation. Suggestions include:

  • Restrict its use for only serious offenses impacting safety or trust.
  • Set a time limit for the removal, usually 24 hours to a couple weeks.
  • Provide ways for the teen to still call/text you as needed.
  • Discuss it as a consequence for rule breaking, not as an attack on connections.
  • Pair it with productive offline activities to deepen your relationship.
  • Follow up once restored – discuss what they learned and how to move forward.

Removing a teen’s phone should be used judiciously, not as an authoritarian power play. Teens resent arbitrary overreach more than reasoned, principled discipline. Phones are so intertwined with teen life that full removal can feel excessive when overused for minor issues. Scaling restrictions based on offense and having collaborative discussions around guidelines gives teens more ownership in the process. Implemented thoughtfully, confiscation may motivate teens to appreciate their phone freedom and use it more responsibly.

The impact of phone removal on parent-teen relationships

Perhaps more important than if a parent takes away a phone is how the teen perceives their parent’s motivation for doing so. Research suggests that:

  • Teens react most negatively when they believe the punishment stems from a parent’s desire to exert control over the child’s life.
  • They are most receptive when the discipline comes across as caring supervision from a place of concern.
  • They appreciate some level of negotiation and participation in setting family technology rules.

Parents aiming to influence teens’ attitudes and behaviors should use disciplinary moments as opportunities for meaningful connection around shared goals and values. Removing a teen’s phone cuts off communication, when improved communication is often what is needed most. Finding the right balance requires empathy, insight into a teen’s worldview, and mutual commitment to trust and respect.

The pros and cons of taking away cell phones summarized

Here are the key pros and cons of removing a teen’s cell phone as punishment at a glance:

Pros Cons
– Restricts privileges and freedom – Removes vital communications
– Takes away enjoyed activities – Doesn’t teach long-term responsibility
– Limits social interactions – Damages trust and relationships
– Motivates compliance – Removes learning and creativity tools
– Halts inappropriate phone activities – Punishes connections with friends/family
– Teaches consequences – Can feel excessive for minor issues


Determining appropriate punishments for teens in the digital age presents new challenges for parents. While taking away a teen’s cell phone has some logic as a disciplinary measure, it also carries risks of severing important connections, stifling learning and creativity, breading resentment, and undermining vital parent-teen trust and communication. Parents should consider the offense, their teen’s level of dependence, and family dynamics before resorting to confiscation. Setting clear rules and reasonable time limits is advised. Where possible, parents should view rule breaking as a chance to collaboratively build responsibility, empathy and mutual understanding with their teens. While phones are central to teens’ lives, the parent-teen relationship is even more vital to guide successfully.