Skip to Content

What does the K in Lgbtqiapk stand for?

The acronym LGBTQIAPK refers to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, intersex, asexual/aromantic/agender, pansexual, and kink communities. The K in the acronym has two common meanings:


One usage of the K is to represent members of the kink community. Kink refers to a range of erotic practices involving roleplaying, restraint, sensory stimulation, and other forms of consensual power exchange. Some common kinks include:

  • BDSM – Bondage, discipline/dominance, submission/sadism, and masochism
  • Roleplaying – Taking on roles like doctor/nurse, teacher/student, etc
  • Fetishism – Arousal from objects, materials, or body parts
  • Exhibitionism/voyeurism – Arousal from being watched/watching others

People who engage in kinky activities may identify as kinky, pervy, or fetishists. The kink community faces some unique challenges, like being stereotyped as abnormal or facing discrimination from vanilla people. Adding the K to LGBTQIAPK shows support and acceptance for consensually kinky people.

Kinkiness or Kinky

Another meaning of the K is to represent kinkiness or kinky people more broadly. This doesn’t necessarily refer to involvement in specific kink practices, but rather being open to kinky sexuality in general. Someone who identifies as kinky may be attracted to:

  • Taboo or transgressive sexual interests
  • Unconventional sexual practices and roleplaying
  • Erotic power exchange and intensity
  • Sexual experimentation and adventure

Identifying as kinky suggests a sexually adventurous spirit and comfort with desires outside the mainstream. This meaning of the K is more general compared to referring specifically to the kink community.

Why Add the K?

There are a few key reasons why the K for kink is increasingly added to the LGBTQIAP acronym:

  • To acknowledge the presence and needs of kinky people within the broader queer community.
  • To create visibility and work against stigma surrounding consensual kink.
  • To indicate acceptance for erotic diversity in all consensual forms.
  • To build connections and solidarity between kinky people and other marginalized identities.

While some argue that kink doesn’t belong in the acronym, others point out the important historical and social overlaps between kinky and queer communities. Both have faced discrimination and false stereotypes around mental illness, dangerousness, and immorality. Recognizing kink sends an important message of inclusivity within LGBTQIAPK organizing and advocacy.

History of the K in LGBTQIA+

The addition of the K for kink or kinky is a relatively recent development in the evolution of the LGBTQIA+ acronym. Here is a brief history:

Year Acronym
Late 1980s LGBT
Early 1990s LGBTI
Mid 1990s LGBTTIQ
Late 1990s LGBTQI
Early 2000s LGBTTIQQA
Late 2000s LGBTQIA
Early 2010s LGBTQ+
Mid 2010s LGBTQIA+
Late 2010s LGBTQIA2S+
Early 2020s LGBTQIA+K

The acronym has evolved to be more inclusive over time. The K for kink emerged in the early 2020s in online communities and activism. Some variations place the K at the end, like LGBTQIA+K or LGBTQIAK. How widely the K gets adopted remains to be seen.

Criticisms and Community Responses

While many welcome the K as a symbol of inclusivity, some critics argue against adding kink communities to the LGBTQIA+ acronym. Common concerns include:

  • Kink is a sexual behavior, not a sexual identity
  • Kink is an adult activity and doesn’t belong in LGBTQIA+ advocacy
  • Kink promotes harmful stereotypes that the LGBTQIA+ community has tried to fight
  • Kink shouldn’t be normalized as it can be used to justify abuse

Advocates for including the K counter that:

  • Kink identity goes beyond just sexual behavior for many people
  • LGBTQIA+ advocacy already addresses sexual matters so kink shouldn’t be excluded
  • Discrimination faces kinky people whether kink is an identity, status, or practice
  • Valid concerns around consent and abuse are worth addressing, but not a reason to ostracize consensual kink

Debates continue around whether kink has a place in the LGBTQIA+ acronym and advocacy work. Both supporters and critics make impassioned arguments. Finding common ground and addressing concerns from multiple perspectives may forge a path forward.

Should the K Stay or Go?

There are reasonable arguments on both sides of whether the K for kink should remain in LGBTQIA+ terminology and community building efforts. Here are some key considerations:

Arguments For Keeping the K Arguments Against the K
  • Promotes visibility and destigmatization of consensual kink
  • Acknowledges presence of kinky queers
  • Celebrates erotic diversity
  • Builds solidarity between communities
  • Risks stereotyping LGBTQIA+ people
  • Conflates behavior with identity
  • Introduces concerns around consent and abuse
  • Kink is adult content that may not belong in advocacy

Both sides raise important considerations about the goals of LGBTQIA+ organizing, who it aims to serve, and what message it wants to send. Rather than a yes or no question, a thoughtful discussion can explore how to embrace kinky queers while being mindful of concerns. There may be a nuanced path forward that avoids marginalizing kinky people or putting other LGBTQIA+ communities at risk of harm.

Potential Compromises

Rather than a black-and-white decision to keep or remove the K, some potential compromises include:

  • Using the K only in adult-focused outreach, education, and organizing efforts
  • Acknowledging kinky queers while keeping the acronym itself neutral
  • Critically examining laws and biases against kink but leaving the acronym unchanged
  • Focusing advocacy on destigmatization and anti-discrimination, not public visibility

With thoughtful dialogue, the LGBTQIA+ community may find solutions that don’t require marginalizing consensual kink to address valid concerns. For example, fighting anti-kink discrimination in healthcare, housing, custody, and employment without necessarily embracing public kink events. Allies can support the basic rights of kinky people while still critiquing problematic aspects of kink culture when they arise. There are opportunities to forge connection while still maintaining important distinctions between the groups.

Kink and Intersectionality

Issues of kink and the K in LGBTQIA+ are deeply intertwined with race, gender, class, and other identities. Some key areas where kink and intersectionality overlap include:

  • Stereotypes – Racist myths about people of color being sexually deviant or dangerous are used to marginalize both kink and queer communities of color.
  • Access – People with disabilities, poorer socioeconomic status, and racial marginalization have less access to kink resources, education, and community.
  • Harassment – Gender and power dynamics that enable harassment in society also lead to unwanted fetishization and boundary-crossing in kink contexts.
  • Stigma – Black kinky women face compounded stigma at the intersection of racism, misogyny, and whorephobia.

An intersectional lens is vital for addressing concerns about kink in LGBTQIA+ contexts. Racism, sexism, ableism and other systems of oppression shape people’s perceptions of kink as well as access to safe, consensual kink spaces. Discussions of the K must consider diversity in who participates in kink, how it intersects with other identities, and disparities in both risks and access.


The meaning of the K in LGBTQIA+ is complex, personal, and evolving. For some, it stands as a symbol of embracing kinky queer people and consensual erotic diversity. For others, it raises concerns about conflating behavior with identity and introducing issues they feel don’t belong in LGBTQIA+ advocacy.

There are good faith arguments on all sides of this issue. Finding solutions that increase inclusion while maintaining safety and addressing potential harm is an ongoing discussion within LGBTQIA+ communities. It requires nuance, compassion, and listening across differences to find a way forward.

Rather than a definitive yes or no, the conversation around the K raises broader questions of how marginalized communities define themselves and what solidarity looks like across lines of difference. By approaching these conversations with openness, patience and good intent, communities can find ways to foster understanding across these lines. The discussion itself opens opportunities for education, connection and growth.