Skip to Content

Why do the British call diapers nappies?

The British refer to diapers as “nappies”, which often causes confusion among Americans and other nationalities that primarily use the word “diapers”. This difference in terminology reflects the divergent evolution of British and American English over the past few centuries. Examining the etymology and history behind these two words provides insight into the linguistic and cultural forces that shaped their predominant usage in each country. While both terms refer to the same essential item, the choice of “nappies” versus “diapers” highlights some of the subtle variances between British and American English.

Etymology of “Diapers” and “Nappies”

The word “diaper” has its origins in the Middle English “diapre”, meaning a high quality cotton or linen fabric with a woven pattern of small repeated designs. This fabric was initially called “diasper” in Old French, which derived from the Greek “diaspros” meaning “embroidered”. In the 14th and 15th centuries, small cloths made from the diaper fabric were used as undergarments for young children before the invention of modern disposable diapers. The word “diaper” came to refer to the cloth undergarment itself.

The term “nappy” has a similar evolution, although from a different root word. It derives from the Middle English “nappe”, meaning a sort of cloth, which itself came from the Old French “nape”. “Nappy” emerged as English baby talk for a diaper or clout, both words used to describe an infant’s undergarment. “Nappy” was in common British usage by the early 20th century.

So while “diaper” and “nappy” have different etymological origins, they both referred to a cloth garment worn by babies to absorb excrement. The words were synonymous for several centuries. Their divergent modern usage appears to have arisen in the 20th century.

The Rise of Disposable Diapers

The divergence of “diapers” and “nappies” began with the rise of disposable diapers in the 20th century. As disposable absorbent paper diapers emerged as an alternative to traditional cloth diapers, American English adopted “diapers” as the universal term for these new products. However, British English maintained the traditional term “nappy” in reference to absorbent undergarments for babies.

Several key events appear to have solidified “diapers” in American English and “nappies” in British English:

– In 1942, a Swedish paper called Pauliström began manufacturing a disposable cellulose absorbent pad marketed as “Pauliström’s throw away nappy”. This product was advertised and sold in the UK, reinforcing “nappy” as the British term.

– In 1948, Marion Donovan invented the first waterproof diaper cover in the US. Her products evolved into the disposable paper diaper sold under the brand name “Diaperaps” in 1949. Their marketing focused on the American market and likely influenced the US adoption of “diaper”.

– In 1950, Johnson & Johnson launched their disposable diaper product in the US under the brand name “Chux”, further ingraining “diaper” as the favored American term.

– In 1956, Paddi Lund developed the modern disposable diaper with tape fasteners in Sweden. These were sold in the UK under the brand “Paddi”, likely contributing to the continued British usage of “nappy”.

So while both disposable and cloth diapers/nappies coexisted for many decades, the terminology diverged based on whether the major manufacturers marketed specifically to British or American consumers.

Cultural Connotations

Beyond origins and marketing, the different cultural connotations of “diapers” versus “nappies” may also contribute to their divergent usage:

– “Diapers” is the more formal and clinical term, fitting with American cultural tendencies. It sounds similar to medical products like bandages and gauze.

– “Nappies” is more informal and colloquial, suiting British cultural speech patterns. The “-y” ending creates a softer, intimate feel.

– Americans may associate “nappy” with the racial slur usage of “nappy hair”, contributing to avoidance of the British term.

– The two-syllable cadence of “dia-pers” fits typical American English speech patterns better than the harsher single-syllable “nap-pies”.

So in addition to the products’ marketing and associations, the terms’ linguistic properties and cultural connotations likely helped entrench “diapers” in America and “nappies” in Britain.

Modern Usage

In contemporary English, “diapers” remains the standard term for disposable absorbent undergarments for infants in American English, while British English favors “nappies”:

– Online American retailers sell “diapers” from brands like Pampers and Huggies. British retailers sell “nappies”.

– American parenting blogs and magazines universally refer to the products as “diapers”. British equivalents use “nappies”.

– The American National Diaper Bank Network provides diapers to families in need. The equivalent UK organization is the Nappy Alliance.

– Among the American public, asking where the “nappies” are would cause confusion. The reverse is true in Britain.

However, with globalization and cross-cultural media exposure, the terms are gradually gaining more shared familiarity:

– Some American parents are starting to adopt “nappies” for a slightly more playful term, though “diapers” still dominates.

– British media aimed at younger generations, like parenting forums, sometimes use “diapers” alongside “nappies” to appeal to a broader audience.

– As more British media reaches American audiences, through shows like Downton Abbey or Harry Potter, “nappy” is becoming recognized, though not widely adopted.

So the broad cultural-linguistic divide remains largely intact, though some blurring of terminology is occurring.


While Americans and the British share a common ancestral language, centuries of cultural drift and linguistic evolution created a divergence in the terminology of “diapers” versus “nappies”. The historical development, marketing, and cultural associations of each term entrenched their usage regionally. Some crossover is gradually occurring in the modern globalized media landscape. However, the basic distinction remains in place as a fascinating example of how language adapts differently across geographic and cultural lines. Examining this divergent terminology provides insight into the sociolinguistic forces that shape English dialects worldwide.