Skip to Content

Is empathy learned or genetic?

Empathy, the ability to understand and share the feelings of others, is a complex human trait that likely arises from both nature and nurture. While genetic factors contribute to individual differences in empathy, experiences and environment also play a critical role in shaping empathy from childhood through adulthood.

What is empathy?

Empathy involves both sharing others’ emotions (affective empathy) and understanding their perspective (cognitive empathy). It allows us to tune into how someone else feels and understand their situation from their point of view.

Empathy differs from sympathy, which is feeling concern for someone’s suffering without necessarily sharing their feelings. It also differs from emotional contagion, which is involuntarily “catching” someone else’s emotions.

True empathy requires consciously imagining what another person is thinking and feeling while maintaining a clear separation between self and other. It involves both emotional sharing and perspective-taking.

Is empathy innate or learned?

Research suggests empathy has roots in both genetics and experience.

Studies of infants indicate humans may be wired from birth to empathize. Young babies display precursor behaviors to empathy, like responding to others’ emotions with concern. They also show early forms of emotional contagion, taking on the feelings of those around them.

However, empathy involves complex cognitive processes that develop gradually through childhood. While basic emotional contagion appears to be innate, mature empathic abilities likely require learning through social interaction and life experience.

Evidence for innate empathy

Several lines of research point to innate empathic tendencies in humans:

  • Babies often cry in response to hearing another baby cry, suggesting emotional contagion.
  • Children as young as 2 years old sometimes comfort others in distress.
  • Identical twins show more similar empathy levels than fraternal twins, hinting at genetic factors.
  • People with autism tend to have lower empathy, linked to underdeveloped social-cognitive brain systems.

Studies also find that empathy has deep evolutionary roots. More social animals like primates tend to be more empathic than less social species. This suggests natural selection has shaped empathy as an adaptive trait for group living.

Evidence for learned empathy

At the same time, life experiences clearly shape empathy development:

  • Empathy improves as children gain social experience and cognitive abilities.
  • Parental warmth and secure attachment promote empathy in kids.
  • Empathy can be enhanced through training and learning.
  • Trauma and adverse events hamper empathy development.

fMRI studies show empathy activates brain regions involved in social cognition, which mature gradually throughout childhood and adolescence. This highlights the critical role experience plays in shaping empathic neural pathways.

Genetic factors

While empathy depends on both nature and nurture, researchers have identified some specific genetic variants associated with individual differences in empathy:

  • OXTR gene – Variants affect oxytocin receptor function, which influences bonding and sociality.
  • AVPR1a gene – Linked to vasopressin receptor variations affecting social behaviors.
  • 5-HTTLPR gene – Affects serotonin transporter activity and responsiveness to others’ emotions.

The involvement of oxytocin and vasopressin is significant, as these neurotransmitters shape social cognition and affiliation. Differences in their receptor genes contribute modestly to variability in human empathy.

Twin studies

Twin studies allow researchers to tease apart genetic from environmental influences on traits. Identical twins share 100% of genes, while fraternal twins share only 50% on average. Comparing empathy in identical vs. fraternal twin pairs reveals insight into its heritability.

One meta-analysis of 7 twin studies estimated:

  • Affective empathy has 48% heritability.
  • Cognitive empathy has 53% heritability.

This indicates both affective sharing and perspective-taking have moderate genetic foundations. However, nearly half the variability depends on environment and experience.

Sex differences

Women tend to score higher on empathy assessments than men. Twin studies suggest this gap is partly genetic:

  • Heritability of affective empathy was 64% in girls vs. 47% in boys.
  • Heritability of cognitive empathy was 48% in girls vs. 42% in boys.

Sex hormones likely contribute to these differences. For example, giving testosterone to young women reduces empathic responses. But social and cultural factors also influence sex differences in learned empathic behaviors.

Environmental factors

Although genes impact empathy, environmental influences remain crucial in shaping its growth and expression.

Childhood experiences

Early caregiving relationships are key for developing cognitive and emotional aspects of empathy.

  • Secure infant attachment promotes empathy later on.
  • Parental warmth, sensitivity, and responsiveness foster children’s empathy.
  • Harsh parenting and abuse inhibit empathy growth.

These effects likely occur through both social learning and impacts on brain development. Nurturing parenting provides models for empathic behavior and shapes brain circuits supporting social cognition.

Learning and training

Explicit empathy training can enhance empathic skills and tendencies in both children and adults. Approaches include:

  • Roleplaying and perspective-taking activities
  • Reading emotionally-evocative literature
  • Practicing compassion and mindfulness meditation
  • Learning nonviolent communication and listening skills

Targeted empathy programs in schools have improved children’s social skills and reduced bullying. Similar training yields increased empathy in health professionals.

Culture and demographics

Cultural and socioeconomic factors also predict empathy differences:

  • Women tend to score higher in empathy than men across cultures.
  • Collectivist cultures encourage more empathy than individualist cultures.
  • Higher empathy characterizes lower vs. higher social class individuals.

These patterns likely emerge from subtle differences in gender, cultural, and class socialization. Social norms and roles shape learned empathic engagement with others.

Adverse experiences

Finally, adverse events can impede normal empathy development if they occur early in life or chronically over time:

  • Childhood trauma and abuse
  • Neglect
  • Social deprivation
  • High stress

Such experiences appear to blunt empathy through both psychological effects like emotional numbing and changes in brain circuits governing affiliation and social cognition.

Age and gender differences

Studies find systematic age and gender patterns in empathy emergence that reflect interplay between biological maturation and social learning:

Age Developmental Milestones
Infants – Show emotional contagion

– May cry when hearing other babies cry
Toddlers – Comfort others spontaneously

– Show concern for distressed parents

– Engage in pretend play
Preschoolers – Can differentiate self from others

– Begin sharing toys and cooperating with peers
School-age – Understanding of others’ perspectives improves

– More complex social interactions with peers

– Girls tend to show more empathy than boys
Adolescents – Advanced perspective-taking skills emerge

– Empathy continues improving but often dips temporarily
Adults – Empathy skills plateau in early adulthood

– Women maintain advantage over men in empathy

These patterns reflect the interplay of innate tendencies, social learning, and developmental cognitive maturation across childhood through adulthood.

Brain regions involved in empathy

Neuroimaging studies reveal a network of brain regions activate during empathy tasks. Key areas include:

  • Anterior insular cortex – critical for emotional sharing
  • Inferior frontal gyrus – involved in mirroring emotions
  • Ventromedial prefrontal cortex – supports understanding others’ mental states
  • Posterior superior temporal sulcus – processes biological motion and intentions
  • Amygdala – detects emotional signals and assesses salience

This “empathy circuitry” develops throughout childhood in tandem with social cognitive maturation. Nurturing caregiving likely supports its growth by providing social learning opportunities.

Overlaps with theory of mind network

The empathy network substantially overlaps with regions involved in theory of mind or mentalizing. This is the ability to attribute mental states like desires, beliefs, and intents to others. Theory of mind allows us to understand others’ perspectives.

Areas like the medial prefrontal cortex and superior temporal sulcus activate when inferring both feelings and thoughts of others. This highlights the tight developmental link between affective and cognitive empathy.

Mirror neuron system

Specific neurons called mirror neurons activate when performing or observing an action. They likely contribute to embodying others’ emotions to share their feelings.

The mirror system involves the inferior frontal cortex, inferior parietal lobe, and premotor cortex. Researchers propose dysfunction in this mirroring network may contribute to empathy deficits in autism.

Practical uses of empathy research

Understanding the roots of empathy has important applications:

  • Improving empathy training programs and social curricula in schools
  • Developing targeted interventions for conditions like autism and conduct disorder
  • Reducing prejudice and promoting cross-group empathy
  • Designing selection and training of professionals like physicians and therapists

For example, research highlights the importance of secure attachment and parental warmth for building empathy in childhood. This informs best practices for caregivers. Studies also reveal empathy is malleable and can be enhanced through training even in adulthood. Practices like perspective-taking, role-playing, and mindfulness may cultivate more empathic individuals, families, communities, and society.

Future research directions

While great progress has been made, key questions remain about the roots of human empathy:

  • How do genes specifically affect the development of empathy circuitry in the brain?
  • How does empathy dysfunction in autism emerge from disruptions in early neural development?
  • Can training or drugs enhance empathy even in adults by altering brain plasticity?
  • What leads to individual differences in empathy within the normal range?
  • What are the complex epigenetic processes by which environments shape gene expression to impact empathy?

Ongoing interdisciplinary research integrating psychology, neuroscience, genetics, and developmental science will continue unraveling the intricate biological and environmental influences that shape empathy across the lifespan.


Empathy arises from a complex interplay between our genes and life experiences. While heritability studies confirm empathy has a partly genetic foundation, environmental factors powerfully shape its emergence and growth. Nurturing caregiving, social learning, training, culture, and life adversity all profoundly impact empathy development across childhood and adulthood. This highlights how both nature and nurture cooperate in constructing our remarkable human capacity to understand and share the feelings of others.